RE: DLSW Question

From: Brad Hedlund (BHedlund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2000 - 23:52:18 GMT-3

• Next message: Brad Hedlund: "RE: Access lists..."
• Previous message: Joel W. Ekis: "RE: IPX on Token Ring"
• Maybe in reply to: Ben Rife: "DLSW Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Your scenario is a good one for DLSW peer groups.

-Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Rife [mailto:brife@bignet.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 6:50 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW Question

This is a basic DLSW question. Here goes.

R1---------R2---------R3

R1 has a local...promiscuous statement and a remote statement to R2

R2 has a local...promiscuous statement

R3 has a local...promiscuous statement and a remote statement to R2

Is there anyway R1 can access a resource on R3 or vice versa in this
configuration? Or do I need to specify each other as remote peers. (R1 and
R3)

If I use border groups in this senario, would that make it work?

Thanks,
Ben

• Next message: Brad Hedlund: "RE: Access lists..."
• Previous message: Joel W. Ekis: "RE: IPX on Token Ring"
• Maybe in reply to: Ben Rife: "DLSW Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:46 GMT-3