From: Gary Bradford (glbradford@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 00:15:57 GMT-3
Can any CCIE's list their number and date of certification. I am kind of
curious to see how fast this number is counting up.
>From: "Jinho Hong" <sthong@ascend.co.jp>
>Reply-To: "Jinho Hong" <sthong@ascend.co.jp>
>To: "Naushad Prasla" <naushad.prasla@sabre.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Joyful day in San Jose, CCIE # 5491
>Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:47:22 +0900
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [208.242.122.8] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBA526AB2006ED820F3AFD0F27A08142E1; Fri Jan 21 19:10:51 2000
>Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
>with SMTP id WAA07708;Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:29 GMT
>Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:29
>+0000
>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>WAA07703GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:28 GMT
>Received: from gate.ascend.co.jp (root@gate.ascend.co.jp
>[202.246.11.253])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
>WAA07690GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:23 GMT
>Received: from home.ascend.co.jp (home.ascend.co.jp [202.246.11.1])by
>gate.ascend.co.jp (8.9.1a/3.7W/09/09/99) with ESMTP id LAA11415;Sat, 22 Jan
>2000 11:43:24 +0900 (JST)
>Received: from potato.ascend.co.jp (potato.ascend.co.jp [202.246.11.2])by
>home.ascend.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7W/10/14/99) with ESMTP id LAA14859;Sat, 22 Jan
>2000 11:43:24 +0900 (JST)
>Received: from jinho2.ascend.co.jp (shinjuku-pool10.ascend.co.jp
>[202.246.11.233])by potato.ascend.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7W/09/21/99) with SMTP id
>LAA29087;Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:45:15 +0900 (JST)
>From nobody@groupstudy.com Fri Jan 21 19:11:02 2000
>Message-ID: <001901bf6483$0347e540$e90bf6ca@jinho2.ascend.co.jp>
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
>Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by groupstudy.com id
>WAA07708
>
>Congratulation!
>
>You are the Man!
>
>Regards,
>Jinho Hong
>CCIE#5263
>
>-----Original Message-----
>·ol : Naushad Prasla <naushad.prasla@sabre.com>
>¶æ : ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>ú : 2000N122ú 10:04
>¼ : Joyful day in San Jose, CCIE # 5491
>
>
> >Hello guys,
> >
> >Finally it's all over. I am now a CCIE # 5491 on January 19, 2000.
> >
> >I would like to take this opportunity to show my gratitude to all the
> >wonderful folks who took their precious time to answer lots of my
>questions.
> >Specially to folks who administer this distribution list. Sorry, the name
> >skips me.
> >
> >I am totally convinced that if it were'nt for this study group, I would
>not
> >have been able to make it in just two attempts. Yes, I failed once in
> >October 1999.
> >
> >I like to share my prespective of the questions already answered by Stan.
> >
> >Did you have any ATM and or AGS stuff on the lab?
> >
> >There are four ways to accomplish ATM connectivity. Classical IP, LANE,
>SVC,
> >and PVC. Be sure to know it all. SVC and PVC are piece of cake. Just few
> >minutes of reading and few lines of configs should do the trick.
> >
> >AGS equipment are end-of-life and are not included.
> >
> >
> >Can you confirm or deny the rumor that some or all of your drawings are
> >lifted
> >from you when you get to troubleshooting?
> >
> >My case was different from Stan regarding this issue. I guess it's
>Proctor
> >dependent rather than the matter of policy. All materials provided by the
> >Proctor were removed except the documentation CD. Yes, it also included
>the
> >LAB topics. I had to solely depend on my notes and diagrams.
> >
> >TIP: List every feature, major and minor, prefferably on the reverse side
>of
> >your notes page. This will help you during the troubleshooting section.
>Your
> >list should include topology as well an routing protocols. For example,
>ATM
> >between R1 & R2. OSPF between R1, R2, R3, and R4. OSPF virtual link
>between
> >R6 & R7, EIGRP between R4 and R5. IPX NLSP between R9 & R10. Decnet Area
>1
> >between R7 & R8, Decnet Area 2 between R3 & R4. You got the idea. More
> >comprehensive the list, easier to troubleshoot.
> >
> >
> >How was the test ? Very difficult ?
> >
> >This test was a killer. My first attempt was relatively easier in my
> >opinion. I was the only one who made it to day two during this two days.
> >Also, during the previous two days, there was also only one candidate who
> >made it to day two. He also passed. So, that makes us two for first four
> >days of this week out to 12. San Jose has exams through out the week,
> >including weekends.
> >
> >I barely made into troubleshooting. However, I had to score big into
> >troubleshooting. I got 99% on troubleshooting section.
> >
> >
> >Since I had so much support from this group that I intend to stay with it
> >and help in any way possible.
> >
> >Again, loads of thanks for all the answers, encouragement and willingness
>to
> >assist.
> >
> >
> >Naushad Prasla
> >
> >CCIE # 5491
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3