From: Bill Carter (bcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 02:31:06 GMT-3
Dan has done this...
http://www.execpc.com/~dkok/
Gary Bradford wrote:
> Can any CCIE's list their number and date of certification. I am kind of
> curious to see how fast this number is counting up.
>
> >From: "Jinho Hong" <sthong@ascend.co.jp>
> >Reply-To: "Jinho Hong" <sthong@ascend.co.jp>
> >To: "Naushad Prasla" <naushad.prasla@sabre.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: Joyful day in San Jose, CCIE # 5491
> >Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:47:22 +0900
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from [208.242.122.8] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> >MHotMailBA526AB2006ED820F3AFD0F27A08142E1; Fri Jan 21 19:10:51 2000
> >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
> >with SMTP id WAA07708;Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:29 GMT
> >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:29
> >+0000
> >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
> >WAA07703GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:28 GMT
> >Received: from gate.ascend.co.jp (root@gate.ascend.co.jp
> >[202.246.11.253])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
> >WAA07690GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:44:23 GMT
> >Received: from home.ascend.co.jp (home.ascend.co.jp [202.246.11.1])by
> >gate.ascend.co.jp (8.9.1a/3.7W/09/09/99) with ESMTP id LAA11415;Sat, 22 Jan
> >2000 11:43:24 +0900 (JST)
> >Received: from potato.ascend.co.jp (potato.ascend.co.jp [202.246.11.2])by
> >home.ascend.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7W/10/14/99) with ESMTP id LAA14859;Sat, 22 Jan
> >2000 11:43:24 +0900 (JST)
> >Received: from jinho2.ascend.co.jp (shinjuku-pool10.ascend.co.jp
> >[202.246.11.233])by potato.ascend.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7W/09/21/99) with SMTP id
> >LAA29087;Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:45:15 +0900 (JST)
> >From nobody@groupstudy.com Fri Jan 21 19:11:02 2000
> >Message-ID: <001901bf6483$0347e540$e90bf6ca@jinho2.ascend.co.jp>
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
> >Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by groupstudy.com id
> >WAA07708
> >
> >Congratulation!
> >
> >You are the Man!
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jinho Hong
> >CCIE#5263
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >·ol : Naushad Prasla <naushad.prasla@sabre.com>
> >¶æ : ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >ú : 2000N122ú 10:04
> >¼ : Joyful day in San Jose, CCIE # 5491
> >
> >
> > >Hello guys,
> > >
> > >Finally it's all over. I am now a CCIE # 5491 on January 19, 2000.
> > >
> > >I would like to take this opportunity to show my gratitude to all the
> > >wonderful folks who took their precious time to answer lots of my
> >questions.
> > >Specially to folks who administer this distribution list. Sorry, the name
> > >skips me.
> > >
> > >I am totally convinced that if it were'nt for this study group, I would
> >not
> > >have been able to make it in just two attempts. Yes, I failed once in
> > >October 1999.
> > >
> > >I like to share my prespective of the questions already answered by Stan.
> > >
> > >Did you have any ATM and or AGS stuff on the lab?
> > >
> > >There are four ways to accomplish ATM connectivity. Classical IP, LANE,
> >SVC,
> > >and PVC. Be sure to know it all. SVC and PVC are piece of cake. Just few
> > >minutes of reading and few lines of configs should do the trick.
> > >
> > >AGS equipment are end-of-life and are not included.
> > >
> > >
> > >Can you confirm or deny the rumor that some or all of your drawings are
> > >lifted
> > >from you when you get to troubleshooting?
> > >
> > >My case was different from Stan regarding this issue. I guess it's
> >Proctor
> > >dependent rather than the matter of policy. All materials provided by the
> > >Proctor were removed except the documentation CD. Yes, it also included
> >the
> > >LAB topics. I had to solely depend on my notes and diagrams.
> > >
> > >TIP: List every feature, major and minor, prefferably on the reverse side
> >of
> > >your notes page. This will help you during the troubleshooting section.
> >Your
> > >list should include topology as well an routing protocols. For example,
> >ATM
> > >between R1 & R2. OSPF between R1, R2, R3, and R4. OSPF virtual link
> >between
> > >R6 & R7, EIGRP between R4 and R5. IPX NLSP between R9 & R10. Decnet Area
> >1
> > >between R7 & R8, Decnet Area 2 between R3 & R4. You got the idea. More
> > >comprehensive the list, easier to troubleshoot.
> > >
> > >
> > >How was the test ? Very difficult ?
> > >
> > >This test was a killer. My first attempt was relatively easier in my
> > >opinion. I was the only one who made it to day two during this two days.
> > >Also, during the previous two days, there was also only one candidate who
> > >made it to day two. He also passed. So, that makes us two for first four
> > >days of this week out to 12. San Jose has exams through out the week,
> > >including weekends.
> > >
> > >I barely made into troubleshooting. However, I had to score big into
> > >troubleshooting. I got 99% on troubleshooting section.
> > >
> > >
> > >Since I had so much support from this group that I intend to stay with it
> > >and help in any way possible.
> > >
> > >Again, loads of thanks for all the answers, encouragement and willingness
> >to
> > >assist.
> > >
> > >
> > >Naushad Prasla
> > >
> > >CCIE # 5491
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3