From: brian.m.edwards@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Jan 17 2000 - 17:00:11 GMT-3
Is it possible that the traffic is going through the 2510. I know that DLSw+ wi
ll translate TR <-> Ethernet between two DLSw peers. Maybe it is using the 2510
as a one-armed router (translator).
Try doing no ip route-cache on the 2510 s0 and then debug ip packet. Then copy
a file from the NT box to the win95 and see if you see any DLSw traffic on the
2510.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken [SMTP:cciecn@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:32 PM
> To: Brad Hedlund; 'Manjeet Chawla'; zhencai
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: dlsw help
>
> I think untill you put an netbios accesslist between
> the 2 routers and it still works, we can not say the
> netbois traffice is locally bridge. I guess, if cisco
> is right, what happens is the netbois traffice is
> bridged to the far end and back to the Token ring
> interface and visa versa. Somebody please try it as I
> do not have any token ring device.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken
>
> --- Brad Hedlund <BHedlund@LifeTimeFitness.com> wrote:
> > Interesting observation guys ... However if I was
> > asked on the CCIE Lab exam
> > to support translational bridging between Ethernet
> > and Tokenring interfaces
> > (which also happened to be running DLSW) I would
> > still go through the
> > motions of the legacy configuration.
> > 'source-bridge transparent'
> >
> > I dont think there is anything wrong with double
> > coverage on the exam.
> > Plus, it would be hard to convince a proctor who
> > didnt believe in it. They
> > wont have Windows workstations in the lab at your
> > disposal to prove your
> > configuration. You wont have time for that anyways.
> >
> > Just my two cents,
> >
> > -Brad
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manjeet Chawla [mailto:mchawla@asanet.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 12:31 PM
> > To: zhencai
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: dlsw help
> >
> >
> > I had experienced the same when I did the my DLSW
> > labs. I thought I was
> > confused, I guess not :-).
> >
> > zhencai wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to Cisco documentation, DLSW+ doesn't
> > provide local translation
> > between token ring and ethernet. However, it does in
> > my case:
> > win95
> > /
> > <----tokenring0
> > -------2510============2513
> > to0 s0 s0 \ <----ethernet0
> >
> > winnt
> > 2510:
> > source-bridge ring-group 100
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2
> > !
> > interface tokenring 0
> > ip address 10.4.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > source-bridge 10 1 100
> > source-bridge spanning
> > !
> > interface serial 0
> > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > router rip
> > network 10.0.0.0
> >
> >
> > 2513:(NO source-bridge transparent command!!!)
> > source-bridge ring-group 100
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.2
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.1
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface tokenring 0
> > ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > source-bridge 20 1 100
> > source-bridge spanning
> > !
> > interface ethernet 0
> > ip address 10.3.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface serial 0
> > ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> > clock rate 64000
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > !
> > router rip
> > network 10.0.0.0
> >
> >
> > win95 and winnt have only NetBEUI enabled. I can see
> > win95 from winnt and
> > vice versa. Any idea?
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> >
> > Zhen Cai
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3