From: Gary Bradford (glbradford@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 02:54:29 GMT-3
This is just another obvious example of a CCIE attempting to prevent all
others from crowding the system. I do agree that that question was worded
wrong (as per the NDA) but if someone came on this site and said they were
working in a study lab and needed some help on an issue, then this is the
place for that type of question. More so then most of the useless
conversation that takes place on this site.
Tony, do you really think that someone asking about preventing saps from
crossing an interface is a nda violation? I have 3 books that do not
violate the NDA (I assume this as none of these published books have
resulted in any CCIE certs from being revoked) that present this as a
"study" lab question.
DOES EVERYONE WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS REALLY ON THE TEST.....
Everything....
You must know it all to stand a good chance at passing. What you don't
know, be ready to figure out using the online docs. Be fast at problem
solving, and finally hope that the things you failed to solve did not carry
enough points to fail you.
>From: "Tony Wang" <quan.wang@ieee.org>
>Reply-To: "Tony Wang" <quan.wang@ieee.org>
>To: "Scott Morris" <SMorris@tele-tech.com>, "Mike McSpedon"
><Mike@ccci.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Sorry Again
>Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 13:34:07 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [208.242.122.8] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBA424E2F00A0D82197BED0F27A0879FF1; Sun Jan 09 13:52:52 2000
>Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
>with SMTP id RAA24071;Sun, 9 Jan 2000 17:26:19 GMT
>Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sun, 9 Jan 2000 17:26:19
>+0000
>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>RAA24067GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 17:26:19 GMT
>Received: from california.com (global.california.com [209.3.224.15])by
>groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24061GroupStudy Mailer; Sun,
>9 Jan 2000 17:26:16 GMT
>Received: from [166.44.154.95] (HELO twang) by california.com (CommuniGate
>Pro SMTP 3.0.1) with ESMTP id 3389435; Sun, 09 Jan 2000 13:34:14 -0800
>From nobody@groupstudy.com Sun Jan 09 13:55:31 2000
>Message-ID: <011201bf5ae9$47fff5e0$da75f99f@mcit.com>
>References: <AA530419FF38D31196930050048A474AEC9B66@gods>
>Organization: IEEE USA
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
>Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>Everybody,
>
>I feel really sorry for this involuntary, unintentional fault again.
>If anybody still feels angry, please directly send email to me.
>I would like to seriously ask for your forgiveness again.
>
>Best Wishes and Thanks again, - Tony
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Scott Morris" <SMorris@tele-tech.com>
>To: "'Tony Wang'" <quan.wang@ieee.org>; "Mike McSpedon" <Mike@ccci.com>;
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 1:05 PM
>Subject: RE: Sorry for NDA
>
>
>There is an NDA signed with EVERY test that you take, and ones assumes you
>have taken at least the written exam prior to being on this particular
>mailing list... So, that shouldn't be a surprise. *shrug*
>
>Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP, CCIE #4713, Security Specialization
>smorris@tele-tech.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:43 GMT-3