From: kongck (kongck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2000 - 05:53:52 GMT-3
Maybe I am wrong,because OSPF alwayse advis LOOPBACK
interface addresses as host routes.U cannot summarize
them.
--- Darrel Hinshaw <dhinshaw@istrength.net> wrote:
> All:
>
>
> First I'm sorry for making this so long.
>
>
>
> Great deal of difficulty here. The usual parameter
> of NO static routes of
> any kind are in effect.
>
>
> R1-->S0------(OSPF
> 0)------S0<--R2-->E0------(IGRP)------E0<--R3-->E1
>
> Interface Addresses:
> R1/S0: 150.100.4.5/24 OSPF Area 0
> R1/L0: 150.100.5.5/30 OSPF Area 0
> R2/S0: 150.100.4.3/24 OSPF Area 0
> R2/L0: 150.100.5.9/30 OSPF Area 0
> R2/E0: 150.100.128.1/24 IGRP
> R3/E0: 150.100.128.2/24 IGRP
> R3/E1: 150.100.129.1/24 IGRP
>
> Problem: How do I distribute OSPF into IGRP on R2? I
> have configured but I
> am unable to get any 150.100.5.x addresses to show
> up in R3's routing table.
> Below are the relevant Configs.
>
> Router 1:
>
> router ospf 5
> network 150.100.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 150.100.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 150.100.14.0 0.0.0.255 area 3
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 3 range 150.100.14.0 255.255.255.0
> area 3 virtual-link 150.100.3.1
>
> Router 2:
>
> router ospf 5
> summary-address 150.100.5.0 255.255.255.0
> redistribute igrp 5 subnets route-map igrpn2ospf
> network 150.100.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 150.100.5.9 0.0.0.0 area 0
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 0 range 150.100.4.0 255.255.255.0
> area 0 range 150.100.5.0 255.255.255.0
>
> router igrp 5
> redistribute ospf 5 metric 10000 10 255 1 1500
> route-map ospfn2igrp
> passive-interface Loopback0
> passive-interface Serial0
> passive-interface Serial0.110
> network 150.100.0.0
> network 0.0.0.0
>
> ip classless
>
> access-list 1 permit 150.100.128.0 0.0.127.255
> access-list 2 deny 150.100.128.0 0.0.127.255
> access-list 2 permit any
> !
> route-map igrpn2ospf permit 10
> match ip address 1
> !
> route-map ospfn2igrp permit 10
> match ip address 2
>
> Router 3:
>
> router igrp 5
> network 150.100.0.0
>
> ip classless
>
>
>
> ANY help would be appreciated.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Darrel Hinshaw
>
>
>
> PS If you have actually read this far . . . THANKS.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:43 GMT-3