Re: RTP

From: Bill Carter (bcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 08 1999 - 11:44:23 GMT-3


   
I went to Halifax. I had no problems with the facility. It was a clean and
comfortable. The town was great. I would suggest arriving 2 days early so
you have time to run around like a $^*# tourist, eat lobster and crab, and
drink Keith's Ale.

The best advice I can give is this, once you step off the airplane don't
study. You will second guess yourself. You either know it or you don't. You
have to be relaxed and confident when you walk into the lab.

"MacDougall, Bruce" wrote:

> You can also go to Halifax.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruce MacDougall
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rick Burts [SMTP:burts@ccci.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 4:30 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Brad Hedlund
> > Subject: Re: RTP
> >
> > I had experience in both RTP and San Jose and I certainly do NOT
> > share that opinion. I did not experience any significant difference
> > in equipment or in operating environment between the sites. Cisco
> > works to make the sites equivalent, and to reduce differences. I
> > think they are fairly successful at this.
> >
> > We are all different and will react to things in somewhat different
> > ways. Some of us may prefer RTP and some may prefer San Jose. I
> > would not want to make a decision about where to take the exam
> > based on someone else reaction.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Brad Hedlund wrote:
> >
> > > This concerns me as I am scheduled for RTP in January.
> > > Does anybody else feel the same way as Eddie?
> > > Has anybody had a positive experience at RTP?
> > > What about San Jose?
> > >
> > > -Brad
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I just came back from RTP and I will never go there again. The room
> > > > is trashy, the equipment is unacceptable and the proctor could be
> > > > more professional.
> > > >
> > > > -Eddie
> > > >
> > > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:59 GMT-3