From: Manjeet Chawla (mchawla@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Dec 04 1999 - 19:55:17 GMT-3
I think Hon is running IBGP and that does not require ebgp-multihop.
Reachibiliity between the peers via IGP or Static Route should establish the
sessions.
-Manjeet
Martin Bander wrote:
> Don't forget the ebgp-multihop comand, since r1's loopback interface is not
> 'directly connected' to r2.
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "hon-siong chan" <honsiong@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: "hon-siong chan" <honsiong@hotmail.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP Update-source
> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 20:28:02 PST
>
> I followed Sam Halabi book on configuring a simple BGP peering by pointing
> to a loopback interface. Scenario is as simple as follows:
>
> -----R1 --------R2
>
> Where R1 has a loopback interface and both are in same AS. In R1, command
> as:
>
> neighbor <R2> remote-as 100
> neighbor <R2> update-source loopback 0
>
> The peering can never be established since then. A "Sh ip bgp neigh" showed
> "Active" status only?!
>
> What's wrong?
>
> Thanks in advance....
>
> HonSiong
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:58 GMT-3