From: Joe Soricelli (jsoricelli@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 17 1999 - 21:25:43 GMT-3
Answers in-line.
-joe
------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph M. Soricelli, CCIE #4803, CCNP, CCSI #20666
EMAIL: jsoricelli@ccci.com
Chesapeake Network Solutions
8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 101E Phone: (703) 207-0757
Falls Church, VA 22042 Fax: (703) 207-0441
FYI - About Chesapeake: We are a Cisco Certified Training and
professional services partner. We offer most of the Cisco
training courses as well as training for Fore, NetScout, and
CheckPoint-1 Firewalls. We provide network consulting services,
including design, network health, management, firewall,
and problem solving. We now have 23 CCIEs on our staff
of instructor/consultants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Muralidhar Devarasetty <dhar_murali@hotmail.com>
To: jsoricelli@fridge.ccci.com <jsoricelli@fridge.ccci.com>
Date: Sunday, October 17, 1999 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP route calculation
>Why there is a ration of 256 between IGRP and EIGRP routes?i observed it
>many times in my lab.
The 256 makes EIGRP more granular and scalable in its route selection.
>Is hop count has nothing to do with these?since I remember studying
>somewhere in cisco site the hop count limit for IGRp is 255 and EIGRP is
>225.Will hop count effects any way for route cal?
AFAIK, both IGRP and EIGRP use the hop count ONLY as a way to detect a
possible routing loop. For instance, if the protocol sees a number of
updates come in with escalating hop counts, a loop might have formed
>I know the formula for route cal is BDRL...
>i am bit confused please clarify me
>Thanks
>Murali
>
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: "Joe Soricelli" <jsoricelli@ccci.com>
>Reply-To: "Joe Soricelli" <jsoricelli@ccci.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: EIGRP route calculation
>Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 11:37:11 -0400
>
>The default constants are k1=k3=1 and k2=k4=k5=0.
>
>This results in BW and DLY being used.
>
>-joe
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:53 GMT-3