From: Mark Detrick (mdetrick@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 11 1999 - 20:30:21 GMT-3
This works fine until the test says no sub-interfaces on a particular port,
which is exactly what happened to me. You should be prepared to not use partic
ular
DLCIs on the physical without using subs.
Chad Marsh wrote:
>
> Or, just assign subinterfaces on the spokes, and assign the DLCI that
> you do want to use with the 'frame-relay interface-dlci' command. Do not
> assign an IP address to the phsyical interfaces, the leftover dlci's
> will be up on the physical interfaces, but without layer 3 addressing,
> the router cannot utilize them.
>
> Chad Marsh
>
> Denton Bobeldyk wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> > quick question:
> >
> > If I have a frame-relay switch providing spoke routers A and C with
> > a separate DLCI to hub router B. And I am also providing them with a
> > DLCI directly from A to C - but I don't want them to use that DCLI.
> >
> > I disabled inverse arp on each of the spokes with 'no frame-relay
> > inverse-arp'
> > and then they only use the dlci that's connecting them through the
> > spoke.
> >
> > Is there any other way to do this using the major interface? Perhaps if
> > I was told that I couldn't
> > disable inverse-arp, or is this the only way?
> >
> > Thanks!!!
> >
> > 2 days to go!!!!!!
> >
> > -Denny
> >
> > -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
> > Denton Bobeldyk MCNE, CCDA, CCNA, CCSI
> > Email: denny@kentwoodps.org
> > Phone: 616-530-9196
> >
> > Master CNE - Connectivity
> > Cisco Certified Design Associate
> > Cisco Certified Network Associate
> > Cisco Certified Systems Instructor
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:52 GMT-3