From: jaarons-hotmail (jaarons@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 11 1999 - 18:10:17 GMT-3
I read somewhere that the 10BaseT ASICs would have to be redesigned to
support the increased frame size that ISL creates. This would have been
expensive, etc. So instead it was just integrated into the FastE ASICs.
Thus a good rule of thumb is if it 10BaseT then no ISL...
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Carter <tcarter@cisco.com>
To: Yogesh Kalley <Yogesh_Kalley@glic.com>; Scott O'Donnell
<scotto@iworksys.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 3:30 PM
Subject: RE: 1720 isl capable?
> The 2600 is the lowest router that supports ISL...
>
> Tim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Yogesh Kalley
> > Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 10:23 AM
> > To: Scott O'Donnell
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: 1720 isl capable?
> >
> >
> >
> > I think if the router has a fast ethernet port it should support ISL and
> > inter vlan routing.
> >
> > Any other comments ?
> >
> > yogesh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Scott O'Donnell" <scotto@iworksys.com> on 10/09/99 12:06:56 AM
> >
> > Please respond to "Scott O'Donnell" <scotto@iworksys.com>
> >
> > To: "ccielab@groupstudy.com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > cc: (bcc: Yogesh Kalley/TheGuardian)
> > Subject: 1720 isl capable?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Should I be able to inter-vlan routing via ISL on a 1720 router?
> >
> > Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:52 GMT-3