From: Fred Ingham (fningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 16 1999 - 00:05:35 GMT-3
DLSW always transmits addresses in non-canonical format. The addresses
are translated back to canonical on either end. If the access list is
on the Ethernet interface I would use canonical addresses. I'm not as
sure if the access-list is on the remote peer statement but I would
guess at canonical.
Scott O'Donnell wrote:
>
> To All,
>
> in setting up DLSW between transparent bridges I see that
> a "sho bridge #" references standard ethernet addresses in
> it's forwarding table.
>
> If I then so a "Sho DLSW reach" command, I see that the addresses
> have been translated into a "Token Ring" ordering.
>
> Does DLSW always adjust this way? How does this effect filtering?
> Do I reference the Standard address or the reversed address in an
> access-list?
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:50 GMT-3