From: Jeremy Thompson (myriad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 12 1999 - 15:45:56 GMT-3
Eng -
Actually, this scenario is not from a practice lab - it's a question from one o
f
the actual tests (I've seen a few other people post similar questions from
actual exams and pretend that they are from "practice" scenarios - do you think
those of us who have actually passed the test AREN'T GOING TO NOTICE?).
Fortunately, whoever is so intent on violating their NDA is apparently not
capable of remembering the questions properly. As written here, I don't believe
this is possible. The actual question on the test is definitely solvable, but o
f
course I can't tell you either the question or the answer. So, don't bang your
head against a brick wall over this one. Rest assured, if you truly understand
DLSw+, the scenarios on the exam will not pose a problem for you. And be carefu
l
about posting questions like this in public forums. Cisco takes the NDA quite
seriously, as do most of the people (like myself) who have worked VERY hard to
obtain the CCIE and don't want to see it watered down by people who simply have
good memories. When you obtain your CCIE, you will understand why this is so
irritating.
Jeremy Thompson
CCIE 4951
> From: Chuah Eng Wee [SMTP:chuahew@cyberway.com.sg]
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 6:25 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: chuahew@cyberway.com.sg
> Subject: DLSW interesting scenario
>
> Hi Pple,
>
> Here is an interesting scenario I got from a practice lab.
>
> e0 s0 s0 s1 s0 e0
> ---[r1]--------------[r2]-----------------[r3]-----
> |
> |e0
> Task 1
> configure such that host at [r2] e0 can access host at [r3] e0. The answer
> is quite obvious.
>
>
> Task 2 (this is the tricky one)
> configure [r1] such that host at [r2] and [r3] can access host at [r1].
> Only ONE peer connection is allowed. Border peer command is not allowed.
>
>
> The initial thot I have is to configure [r2] as border peer and then
> both r1 and r3 will peer with the border peer. But this will
> violate the rules becos no border peer command should be in r1.
>
> Another thot that came across my mind is to configure
> r1 in prosmicuous mode. Then r2 and r3 will peer with r1.
> Doing this will violate the rule again becos there will be 2 peer connection.
> Note that the question states ONE peer connection NOT one peer command.
> That is to say when u do a sh dlsw peer, there should be only ONE connection.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Eng Wee
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:46 GMT-3