From: Chuah Eng Wee (chuahew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 12 1999 - 10:24:57 GMT-3
Hi Pple,
Here is an interesting scenario I got from a practice lab.
e0 s0 s0 s1 s0 e0
---[r1]--------------[r2]-----------------[r3]-----
|
|e0
Task 1
configure such that host at [r2] e0 can access host at [r3] e0. The answer
is quite obvious.
Task 2 (this is the tricky one)
configure [r1] such that host at [r2] and [r3] can access host at [r1].
Only ONE peer connection is allowed. Border peer command is not allowed.
The initial thot I have is to configure [r2] as border peer and then
both r1 and r3 will peer with the border peer. But this will
violate the rules becos no border peer command should be in r1.
Another thot that came across my mind is to configure
r1 in prosmicuous mode. Then r2 and r3 will peer with r1.
Doing this will violate the rule again becos there will be 2 peer connection.
Note that the question states ONE peer connection NOT one peer command.
That is to say when u do a sh dlsw peer, there should be only ONE connection.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Eng Wee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:46 GMT-3