From: Mark Mirrotto (mmirrott@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 28 1999 - 23:40:22 GMT-3
I'll have to get the configs next week.
The .160 subnet is included in the .128 subnet with the .192 mask, right?
Other people are able to recreate the scenario without any problems. Not
sure what my issue is, but the lab I use was recently upgraded to 12.0 code.
It may be a factor because it has not happened before when I set up this
situation under 11.2
Maybe I just needed to reboot everything.
Thanks,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Robichaux, Errol J (CAP, ITS, US) <Errol.Robichaux@gecits.ge.com>
To: 'Mark Mirrotto' <mmirrott@stratos.net>
Date: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 3:37 PM
Subject: RE: OSPF summary address problem
>After drawing out your layout, I have one question. Are you also trying to
>summarize the 172.17.59.160/30 network in some form or fashion. I would be
>curious to see more configuration information regarding this network.
>
>The one thing that I would try is to remove the summary for the .128/28
>network, reboot, and re-summary.
>
>If you send me the configs, I will take a look.
>
>Errol
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Mirrotto [mailto:mmirrott@stratos.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 2:45 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: OSPF summary address problem
>
>
>Hi
>
>I apologize for the length of this message, but I think it is necessary to
>set up the scenario.
>
>R1, R2, and R3 are in a frame relay point-to-multipoint network in subnet
>172.17.59.16 / 28 in OSPF area 0
>R3 R2 share a token ring segment using subnet 172.17.59.128 / 28 in OSPF
>area 3
>R1 to R4 are connected via frame-relay point to point and use subnet
>172.17.59.0 / 28 in OSPF area 1
>R4's ethernet segment is in subnet 172.17.59.160 / 30 in OSPF area 2
>R1's ethernet is in subnet 172.17.59.192 / 29
>R1 to R5 is a standard serial link and is running IGRP only in subnet
>172.17.59.64 / 26
> I know I need to summarize because of the classful nature of IGRP, so I
>summarize 172.17.59.0 / 26 ; 172.17.59.128 / 26 and 172.17.59.192 / 26 on
R1
>and redistribute igrp and ospf mutually - (I used metrics for
>igrp and subnets for ospf) When I do a 'show ip ospf summary' the subnets
>all the proper show up summarized, but the 128 subnet has a very high
>metric, and doesn't't show up on R5. I think this is because R1 's route
to
>the 128 subnet is a O IA route. I create a static route on R1 with the 128
>subnet and a 26 bit mask pointing
>to null 0 and everything works fine. What am I missing? I won't be able to
>use a static route in the lab....
>
>Thanks!
>
>Mark (31 days and counting.....)
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:43 GMT-3