OSPF summary address problem

From: Mark Mirrotto (mmirrott@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 27 1999 - 16:45:24 GMT-3


   
Hi

I apologize for the length of this message, but I think it is necessary to
set up the scenario.

R1, R2, and R3 are in a frame relay point-to-multipoint network in subnet
172.17.59.16 / 28 in OSPF area 0
R3 R2 share a token ring segment using subnet 172.17.59.128 / 28 in OSPF
area 3
R1 to R4 are connected via frame-relay point to point and use subnet
172.17.59.0 / 28 in OSPF area 1
R4's ethernet segment is in subnet 172.17.59.160 / 30 in OSPF area 2
R1's ethernet is in subnet 172.17.59.192 / 29
R1 to R5 is a standard serial link and is running IGRP only in subnet
172.17.59.64 / 26
 I know I need to summarize because of the classful nature of IGRP, so I
summarize 172.17.59.0 / 26 ; 172.17.59.128 / 26 and 172.17.59.192 / 26 on R1
and redistribute igrp and ospf mutually - (I used metrics for
igrp and subnets for ospf) When I do a 'show ip ospf summary' the subnets
all the proper show up summarized, but the 128 subnet has a very high
metric, and doesn'tt show up on R5. I think this is because R1 's route to
the 128 subnet is a O IA route. I create a static route on R1 with the 128
subnet and a 26 bit mask pointing
to null 0 and everything works fine. What am I missing? I won't be able to
use a static route in the lab....

Thanks!

Mark (31 days and counting.....)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:43 GMT-3