From: Scott F. Robohn (sfr@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 07 1999 - 16:55:18 GMT-3
Ron,
You're better off putting the LES/BUS on a subinterface.
You can put it on a major interface, but that *may* (I'm not
100% sure on this) pose some limitations what you can do on
other subinterfaces.
The LECS always goes on the major interface, just as you
have it.
You'll also probably want to use an ELAN name, something
other than 'default' just for practice.
And don't forget 'no shut' on A0. The ATM interfaces are
down by default.
Now back to teaching my FORE class ;)
HTH,
Scott
Ron Trunk wrote:
> Does the LES/BUS go on the physical interface or the subinterface? Most
> things I've read seem to say the subinterface, but the configuration guide
> is a little schizophrenic -- It shows it both ways. Which is correct? Or
> does it matter?
> I'm assuming that I'll be asked to create a elan using the switch as the
> LECS/LES/BUS. My "model" configuration looks like this:
>
> (global)
> lane database mydb
> name default server-atm-address <nsap>
> default-name default
>
> int atm0
> atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
> atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi
> ! bind lecs to database
> lane config auto-config-atm-address
> lane config database mydb
>
> int atm0.1 multipoint
> ! configure les/bus
> lane server-bus ethernet default
> ! configure client
> lane client ethernet
> ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
> Does this config look OK?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help!
>
> Ron
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:41 GMT-3