From: Cavanaugh, Mike J (CAP, ITS, US) (Mike.Cavanaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 12 1999 - 10:34:06 GMT-3
Scott,
Have you tried to add a static route and redistribute static into OSPF? I
believe that will allow your secondary address to propagate.
It will require a static route however. :-(
HTH,
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:SMorris@tele-tech.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 1999 9:25 AM
To: 'Chuah Eng Wee'; Scott Morris; 'cisco@groupstudy.com';
'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: OSPF and secondary IP
I'm not looking for it to establish an adjacency. I'm looking for it to
advertise the network....
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuah Eng Wee [mailto:chuahew@cyberway.com.sg]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 1999 8:31 AM
To: Scott Morris; 'cisco@groupstudy.com'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Re: OSPF and secondary IP
Hi Scott,
OSPF will not establish adjacency on secondary networks.
, see Jeff Doyle's book : ROuting TCP/IP Vol 1
pg 526.
HTH
Eng Wee
At 07:27 09/04/99 -0400, Scott Morris wrote:
>Odd question here... In setting up a secondary IP subnet on an interface,
>why is it that I can't get that particular network to be exchanged by a
>routing protocol??? I'm playing with this under OSPF. I have the network
>statement there, and if I move the subnet to a loopback or something, BOOM,
>the address gets sent out. But if I use it as an IP ADDRESS (ip) (mask)
>SECONDARY under another interface, it never gets sent out to show up in
>anyone's ip routing table. Why???
>
>Scott Morris MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDA
>smorris@tele-tech.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:36 GMT-3