From: Scott Morris (SMorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 09 1999 - 10:27:45 GMT-3
Yeah... I've done it with RIP too, but I don't want RIP. :) I want OSPF.
And it's the same area as other interfaces, so there's no reason is
shouldn't work. Theory anyway.... But it's not unless I make it a primary
address net. Wierd schtuff...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Otto [mailto:jjotto@newf.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 1999 9:01 AM
To: Scott Morris; 'cisco@groupstudy.com'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Re: OSPF and secondary IP
Don't know if this addresses your problem or not, but in the OSPF Design
Guide by Sam Halabi, it talks about secondary addresses with respect to
neighbors.
"Neighbor negotiation applies to the primary address only. Secondary
addresses can be configured on an interface with a restriction that the
have to belong to the same area as the primary address."
Looks like what you've got should work as long as you define them in the
same area. I haven't tried this in practice, so I don't know if it's one
of those "in theory" things, but hope this helps.
I have done this with RIP and it works fine.
Jeremy Otto
At 07:27 AM 4/9/99 -0400, Scott Morris wrote:
>Odd question here... In setting up a secondary IP subnet on an interface,
>why is it that I can't get that particular network to be exchanged by a
>routing protocol??? I'm playing with this under OSPF. I have the network
>statement there, and if I move the subnet to a loopback or something, BOOM,
>the address gets sent out. But if I use it as an IP ADDRESS (ip) (mask)
>SECONDARY under another interface, it never gets sent out to show up in
>anyone's ip routing table. Why???
>
>Scott Morris MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDA
>smorris@tele-tech.com
>
>---------------------
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:36 GMT-3