Yeah, but I would request some low level information , I have a mixed and
mesh network of Cisco routers, F5 load balancers and Juniper ISG firewall.
is it to be done by Route health Injection on Load balancers, I don't think
Firewall can help.
Muhammad Fahad Khan
JNCIE-SEC/SP
Lead Network and Security Consultant - IBM
<http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
wrote:
> That's the standard way of doing things, AFAIK.
> See what GSS systems do.
>
> Just have a dedicated border at each site tracking the VIP (you have to
> fix the local route for that) and advertise/withdraw based on that.
>
> -Carlos
>
> Fahad Khan @ 24/11/2014 07:39 -0300 dixit:
> > Thanks Carlos for the reply.
> >
> > Actually I have a service running on two sites (Main and DR), Requirement
> > is to keep the same IP for service. when the service is running from main
> > site, the IP should be advertised from main site, while when the service
> is
> > down at main site and it becomes available through DR site, the same IP
> > should be advertised through DR..
> >
> > Muhammad Fahad Khan
> > JNCIE-SP/SEC
> > Lead Network and Security Consultant - IBM
> > +92-301-8247638
> > Skype: fahad-ibm
> > http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I guess it's doable, but you would need an extra IP.
> >> (At least that's what I would do)
> >>
> >> I would set this IP as a surrogate for "through site A" reachability.
> >> Then tracking this IP (which would have a static route through site A) I
> >> would change the route to the VIP to either through site A or through
> >> site B, using EEM.
> >>
> >> But I wonder why do you want to do this and not use the standard way of
> >> publishing the destination at the VIP site and following whatever route
> >> you happen to get. Some more info on the topology and restrictions would
> >> be needed.
> >>
> >> -Carlos
> >>
> >>
> >> Fahad Khan @ 24/11/2014 07:04 -0300 dixit:
> >>> Hi experts,
> >>>
> >>> Is it doable through IPSLA with the mixture of OSPF that I track a
> >> service
> >>> IP (kinda VIP) and route the /32 IP and /30 subnet , in case its
> >> available,
> >>> in case its not available I would route the same subnet or IP through
> >> other
> >>> site?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance
> >>> regards,
> >>>
> >>> Muhammad Fahad Khan
> >>> 2x JNCIE-SP/SEC
> >>> Lead Network and Security Consultant - IBM
> >>> +92-301-8247638
> >>> Skype: fahad-ibm
> >>> http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Nov 24 2014 - 19:23:21 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 01 2014 - 07:15:32 ART