Re: OT: CAPWAP Wireless VLAN in Routed Campus LAN

From: marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:19:29 -0500

Correct.
On Jul 26, 2014 8:20 PM, "R.B. Kumar" <seekumarin_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> H - Thank you. Since you said the VLAN ID traffic is encapsulated in
> CAPWAP tunnel, does it mean that the Link between core and distribution
> switch need not be trunked ?
>
> RB
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Leigh Finch <leigh_at_leighfinch.net> wrote:
>
>> In ap local mode, user traffic is encapsulated to the controller
>> (including across l2/l3 boundaries) and offloaded to the configured vlan
>> that has been trunked to the controller.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 27 Jul 2014, at 10:03 am, "R.B. Kumar" <seekumarin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey Marc. Thank you for the response. Let me explain the scenario more
>> > detail
>> >
>> > I will have to WLAN SSID as below
>> >
>> > SSID 1: STUDENT in Wireless VLAN 2. Dynamic Interface created in WLC
>> with
>> > VLAN 2
>> > SSID 2: STAFF in Wireless VLAN 2. Dynamic Interface created in WLC with
>> > VLAN 3
>> >
>> > For keeping the Clients associating in either STUDENT or STAFF Wireless
>> > VLAN do I need Trunk to be configured between Layer-3 distribution
>> switch
>> > and Core Switch where WLC is connected. Do the VLAN configured in WLC
>> has
>> > to be pass thru the Link between Core and Distribution by enabling Trunk
>> > link?
>> >
>> > The answer will help whoever trying to Install the centralized WLC
>> solution
>> > without HREAP. How Wireless VLAN will work in Routed Campus LAN or WAN
>> link
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > RB
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:41 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Your design will work fine if you drop the users in a local vlan off
>> the
>> >> core. If you want the users to be in a local vlan on the 3560s then the
>> >> controller would need layer 2 connectivity.
>> >>
>> >> The APs themselves don't need any specific layer 2 connectivity.
>> >>> On Jul 26, 2014 6:31 PM, "R.B. Kumar" <seekumarin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi All, I am configuring CISCO Wireless LAN Controller in College
>> campus.
>> >>> we have the following components
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. CISCO 4510R as core switch and a centralized WLC is connected to
>> Core
>> >>> Switch
>> >>> 2. CISCO 3560 L3 switch at Distribution Layer Switch
>> >>> 3. CISCO LWAP 1142
>> >>>
>> >>> I want to configure Wireless VLAN in a college campus. Wireless LAN.
>> The
>> >>> requirement is to configure Distribution switch as L3 so that VLAN
>> will
>> >>> not
>> >>> reach till the Core Switch. That is the Link between Distribution and
>> Core
>> >>> Switch will be Layer 3 routed link and not a Trunk Link.
>> >>> Since it is a routed back bone environment, VLAN is configured only in
>> >>> distribution layer switches. So, these configured VLAN will not reach
>> core
>> >>> switch.
>> >>>
>> >>> With that said, is it technically possible to achieve the Wireless
>> VLAN in
>> >>> this above proposed setup.?
>> >>>
>> >>> Do I have to configure Trunk between Distribution Switch (APs are
>> >>> connected) and Core Switch (WLC is connected), to pass the Wireless
>> VLAN
>> >>> in
>> >>> the trunk link?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Advance Thanks for reading and helping to get it clarified
>> >>>
>> >>> regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> RB
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 26 2014 - 21:19:29 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 07:53:01 ART