Re: VIRL/CML Update

Agreed.

The lack of layer 2 support in VIRL/CML is disappointing. Many test
topologies need to test the interaction of layer 2/3 interaction. Hopefully
that will be addressed.
On Jul 13, 2014 7:32 PM, "marc edwards" <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Great write up!
>
> On Sunday, July 13, 2014, Shaun Gomez (4g1vn) <shaun.gomez_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > With VIRL/CML coming out soon (disclaimer, FCS dates are ALWAYS subject
> to
> > change), I did a brief post on my blog. Many of my clients have been
> asking
> > for more detailed information on VIRL/CML then what was available, so I
> > aggregated all I know. Please let me know your thoughts on this post and
> if
> > you find it helpful.
> >
> > http://www.4g1vn.com/2014/07/virlcml-update/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > shaun
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Marc Edwards
> CCIE #38259
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jul 13 2014 - 19:40:25 ART