Hi,
It is expected behaviour based on how the network command operates for IGP
vs BGP. When you say include-connected it means include those interface on
which the protocol wash enabled by network commands, which for BGP does not
apply as the network command in BGP does NOT enable the protocol on an
interface.
Regards,
Cristian Matei, 2 x CCIE #23684 (R&S/SC)
cmatei_at_INE.com<mailto:cmatei_at_INE.com>
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.INE.com<http://www.ine.com/>
On 14 Jun 2014, at 13:12, GAURAV MADAN
<gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com<mailto:gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi
I understand the fact that in case of ipv6 redistribution ; we are supposed
to manually redistribute the connected intrefaces as well .
However ; i have following scenarios :
BGP <->opfv3
when i do from ospfv3 to bgp redistibution ; i have include-connected
keyword present as an option in CLI
But when i do from bgp to ospfv3 ; i do not have that keyword ::
router bgp 999
!
!
address-family ipv6
redistribute ospf 999 include-connected <<<<< fine
exit-address-family
R1(config)#router ospfv3 100
R1(config-router)# router-id 1.1.1.1
R1(config-router)# !
R1(config-router)# address-family ipv6 unicast
R1(config-router-af)# redistribute bgp 100 ?
metric Metric for redistributed routes
metric-type OSPF/IS-IS exterior metric type for redistributed routes
route-map Route map reference
tag Set tag for routes redistributed into OSPF
<cr>
Hence i have to do
redistribute connected + redistribute bgp
is this always the case or am i missing something ??
Gaurav Madan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 14 2014 - 05:38:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 01 2014 - 06:32:36 ART