RE: EIGRP NAMED MODE

From: Doug Kenline <dkenline_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 22:47:09 -0400

Enjoy another free CCIE R&S V5 Lab Training vLecture on EIGRP Named Mode.

http://blog.ipexpert.com/2014/03/12/another-free-ccie-rs-v5-training-video-fr
om-marko-ipexpert/

Doug Kenline
Reston, Virginia

> CC: cmatei_at_ine.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> From: mothafungla_at_gmail.com
> Subject: Re: EIGRP NAMED MODE
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:02:31 +0000
> To: michaelolusegunrufai_at_gmail.com
>
> Also wide metric 64-bit calculations are only available in named
configurations.
>
> That is if you want the correct ip cef per destination load balancing
results of 1G+ links (say ether-channels)
>
> Wide metrics change the K1/K3 calculations to 65536 decimal as a constant &
introduce a K6 extended attribute for future use
>
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 25 Mar 2014, at 16:16, segs <michaelolusegunrufai_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Cristain, will check it out as suggested on Cisco Live 365.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Cristian Matei <cmatei_at_ine.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> To get the functional benefit you need to look through the available
> >> options, what you configure where and you9ll identity the use of it.
> >> It9s basically more scalable, configuration wise, it brings hierarchy
into
> >> EIGRP and is very much alike BGP. The main benefit (except MTR), is that
> >> is the same instance supports configuration for IPv4/IPv6/VRF, thus it
> >> bring address-familty support into EIGRP.
> >> You can go through the Cisco Live session named 3Advances in EIGRP2,
it9s
> >> very good.
> >>
> >> Cristian Matei, 2 x CCIE #23684 (R&S/SC)
> >> cmatei_at_INE.com
> >>
> >> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> >> http://www.INE.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 24/03/14 12:09, "segs" <michaelolusegunrufai_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Guys,
> >>> Been going through EIGRP named mode and really i do not see the
functional
> >>> benefit of configuring EIGRP this way, seems a lot like Cisco just felt
> >>> they should just make modifications to how people know how to configure
> >>> this protocol for the fun of it. Please correct me if i am wrong.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Mar 25 2014 - 22:47:09 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 03 2014 - 17:12:31 ART