Re: Same subnet for two Multipoint interfaces on Framerelay

From: Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:40:50 -0700

Please search the Study Group archives. If I recall correctly we had this conversation about 2 years ago.

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)

> On Mar 17, 2014, at 4:06 AM, "Andrew LaPorte" <andy_at_cloud9.net> wrote:
>
> Only example of this I have seen was in a study lab.
>
> The reason was the router was the hub of a frame relay where the spokes were
> on different serial connections but all had to share a common subnet. This
> goes against what we have been taught from early on that an IP address must
> be unique on a router (with the exception of unnumbered).
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Muhammad Adil (aka Venkat)
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:49 PM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Same subnet for two Multipoint interfaces on Framerelay
>
> Hi,
>
> I see a router accepts same subnet to be used for two different multipoint
> sub i/fs of the same router. I am wondering why this is supported and is
> there any case study for it.
>
> Please advise if you have any info about this.
>
> Regards
> Adil
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Mar 17 2014 - 07:40:50 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 03 2014 - 17:12:31 ART