Hey all,
Every time i think I have a grasp on QoS I hit more issues.
Firstly here is what I think I know (don't worry, its not much.. random
numbers used, typos excused)
1) When you setup just QoS using the MQC you can match protocols under
class-maps via NBAR example:
!
class-map CMAP_ICMP
match proto icmp
!
policy-map PMAP_ICMP
class CMAP_ICMP
priority 54 4000
!
2) When you shape you use the CB-GTS to shaping as follows:
!
policy-map PMAP_SHAPE
class class-default
shape ave 51200 8000 0
!
Ok, so what gives here & my question(s) arise.
1) If i want to then use my CBWFQ policy that uses NBAR matching I cannot
nest this inside a CB-GTS like so;
!
policy-map PMAP_SHAPE
shape ave 51200 8000 0
service-policy PMAP_ICMP
!
*note i was applying this to a sub-interface fe0/0.1 if that is why I had
problems.
2) To make this work, I need to change my CBWFQ policy so that it does not
use NBAR matching as follows:
!
ip access-list ext ACL_ICMP
permit icmp any any
!
class-map CMAP_ICMP
match access-gro ACL_ICMP
!
*And this now will nest happily under the CB-GTS.
So, and thanks for sticking with me, what I want to know is, is this
statement true:
*When performing CB-GTS (regardless of interface) you cannot nest a CB-WFQ
policy that uses NBAR matching.....*
I have done my googling, but you know I find it easier to write this out,
helps me visualize the problem.
If you can put me right, I would be most grateful.. :)
Your pal,
\Sam
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Mar 16 2014 - 17:08:36 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 03 2014 - 17:12:31 ART