Note
When you configure NAT with a VRF-enabled interface address that acts as the
global address, you must configure the ip nat inside source static no-alias
command. If the no-alias keyword is not configured, Telnet to the VRF-enabled
interface address fails.
So use case in your scenario is lost as it's not a vrf enabled interface
-- BR Tony Sent from my iPad > On 27 Nov 2013, at 21:41, Matt Sherman <matt.sherman2_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Can someone clear up for me what "no-alias" is supposed to do with NAT. > The scenario I'm testing is this - > > R7 (f0/0) -- (f0/0) R1 (s1/1) -- (s1/1) R3 > > R7 (f0/0) = 192.168.4.110 > R1 (f0/0) = 192.168.4.1 > R1 (s1/1) = 192.168.13.1 > R3 (s1/1) = 192.168.13.3 > > Translating R3's 192.168.13.3 to 192.168.4.3 on R1 works fine. I can ping > R7 from R3. > _________________________________________________ > ((R1)) > ip nat inside source static 192.168.13.1 192.168.4.3 > ! > int s1/1 > ip nat inside > ! > int f0/0 > ip nat outside > _________________________________________________ > > But when I put the no-alias extenstion on the static NAT (ip nat inside > source static 192.168.13.1 192.168.4.3 no-alias), R3 can no longer ping or > connect to R7. > > I know that adding the "no-alias" makes R1 no longer reply to ARPs for the > translated address (192.168.4.3) but then what's the point? It breaks all > communication. > > Thanks, > Matt > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Nov 27 2013 - 22:01:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 01 2014 - 20:26:19 ART