Re: MPLS TE FRR Detour

Yes. Juniper supports one-to-one protection. When you configure an LSP in
JunOS, and specify FRR, this will be the default method. But you can also
do Facility protection (Node or Link).

Cisco only supports Facility FRR.

-YuriB

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm reading up on MPLS TE FRR and saw something about two ways of
> protecting Links and Node:
> 1. one to one protection
> 2. many to one protection (facility protection)
>
> This is based on RFC4090 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4090)
>
> So my question... has Cisco or Juniper implemented the one to one
> protections? I can't seem to find any way of configuring that.
>
> Just as a background info. One to one protection does not impose an FRR
> label during a failure, but rather uses the RSVP DETOUR Object to failover
> to another LSP. The many to one protection imposes an FRR label on top of
> the stack and can protect multiple LSP not just one.
>
> Thanks in advance for any input.
>
> *Tom Kacprzynski*
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 24 2013 - 14:49:20 ART