Re: OSPF LSA TYPE 3 OVER BACKDOOR LINK

that obviously is not an option.
On Sep 24, 2013 4:46 PM, "Eduardo Vazquez" <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Then just make the cost bigger on the route you prefer.
>
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2013, Tolulope Adeniji wrote:
>
>> THEY ARE BOTH OIA ROUTES
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, <tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > O routes are preferred over OIA routes always. You might want to look
>> into
>> > Sham-links.
>> >
>> > HTH
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent by 'Tobi Babs via a mobile device. Please excuse its brevity, and
>> any
>> > form of misspellings.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Tolulope Adeniji <toluadeniji_at_gmail.com>
>> > Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>> > Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:55:22
>> > To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> > Reply-To: Tolulope Adeniji <toluadeniji_at_gmail.com>
>> > Subject: OSPF LSA TYPE 3 OVER BACKDOOR LINK
>> >
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > Why would a CE prefer a OSPF type 3 lsa learnt over backdoor link to
>> same
>> > type 3 lsa advertised by connecting PE despite the higher metric across
>> the
>> > backdoor link.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Sep 24 2013 - 19:08:18 ART