Re: stub area and bgp next hops

From: Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 13:13:18 +0100

I don't see a problem with that, what happened when you tested it?

--
BR
Tony
Sent from my iPhone on 3
On 22 Sep 2013, at 11:15, Imran Ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> let  say  that  we  have  a router  with stub or totally  nssa , with
> default route,
> 
> can this default route be  used to validate bgp next hops. ?
> 
> 
> when ebgp peer forward the update to ibgp peers  the  next hop remains same
> by default .
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Sep 22 2013 - 13:13:18 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 01 2013 - 06:36:35 ART