True Tony, Thanks got to know from the vendor as well. This is the default
behavior
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rakesh
>
> From my understanding the RFC3623 implementation of GR is implemented as
> default in IOS this would include the ietf helper configuration.
>
> A quick google shows that for the t640 also follows the RFC3623 convention
> and enables ietf helper by default.
>
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 27 Jul 2013, at 12:52, Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello ,
> >
> > We have a implementation where in we have a standard peering with Juniper
> > T640 and Cisco Gsr Series Router.
> >
> > While labbing up between Two Junipers about a GR feature, i have enabled
> Gr
> > on one of the Junipers while the Other router started responding with its
> > Gr Extensions without any explicit configuration in place. (Device is at
> > its defaults - I have not disabled Gr)
> >
> > My query irrespective of any vendors here would be, if i have GR enabled
> > specially on a single router, does other router automatically start
> > supporting the prior one without explicitly configuring any Gr or related
> > parameters ? . Does the Helper mode kickoff irrespective of enabling any
> GR
> > features on the other-end ? When Gr was explicitly disabled i could not
> > see any support on the device and hence traffic was getting dropped.
> >
> > Copying and pasting the output here would make much of Other Vendor
> Centric
> > so, I just wanted to keep this discussion till this point.
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Sep 15 2013 - 20:34:13 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 01 2013 - 06:36:35 ART