Re: RIPng UDP port

Do you have a link for the documentation?

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device.
Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)

On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Barney BriseC1o
<daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> Guys
> I found it! Rip processes do not separate with different rip process
labels.
> To separate the routing information between two diffent rip label process we
must change the port of under de routing process with port port-number
multicast-group multicast-address
>
>
> > CC: daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > From: marco207p_at_gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: RIPng UDP port
> > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:04:07 -0500
> > To: narbikk_at_gmail.com
> >
> > AFAIK, only if you VRF it out.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe Sanchez
> >
> > ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile
device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)
> >
> > On Aug 6, 2013, at 6:19 AM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel,
> > >
> > > Are you talking about running two different RIPng processes on the same
> > > router?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Daniel Barney Briseqo <
> > > daniel.barney.b_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello every one,A couple of weeks ago I read about RIPng, Today while
> > >> doing a lab, a doubt came to me and I could find the reference back. I
was
> > >> hoping you guys can help me.
> > >> When having two different RIPng labels, Do we need to change de udp
port
> > >> 521
> > >> for one routing process in order to work? If yes, how can we archive
this
> > >> and
> > >> if possible could you send me the link reference please
> > >> Thank you :)Daniel Barney
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
Received on Wed Aug 07 2013 - 14:37:18 ART