Cisco ISE best solution by far.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Trey Forbes <treyforbes_at_gmail.com>
Date: 07/23/2013 8:16 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Cikekhuah <cikekhuah_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Cisco NAC or Juniper NAC
I evaluated both for an enterprise 802.X NAC solution (50,000 user, 150,000
endpoint) and went with Juniper UAC. The environment is mixed
Cisco/Enterasys wired and Cisco/Aruba wireless. The rollout is nearing
completion and I am glad we went with UAC. The Juniper developers have
turned around separate feature requests in only a few weeks and the support
has been great.
Good luck.
Trey Forbes
CCIE#18016
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Cikekhuah <cikekhuah_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Colleagues,
>
> Which NAC solution between these two vendors do u think is more suitable
> for a mixed environment having Cisco, Juniper n Huawei boxes at remote
> sites. I was thinking there might be compatibility issues, deployment mode
> issues etc. Also how is 802.1x compatibility managed between these two
> vendors?
>
> Appreciate your candid opinion
>
> Chris
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jul 23 2013 - 09:10:55 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 01 2013 - 08:45:50 ART