Re: Cisco ACE replacement

thank you

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:

> This is actually better than my own notes ****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
http://www.netscalerkb.com/netscaler-qa/command-for-viewing-logs-in-varnslog-
and-varlog-please-help/
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> we usually review the number of connections at a single point of time,
> then graph the results so we are using perl and or snmp in different
> places to graph historical load on vservers.****
>
> ** **
>
> FYI****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Sirhan Khan [mailto:khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 19, 2013 4:16 AM
> *To:* Joseph L. Brunner
> *Cc:* itguy.pro_at_gmail.com; marco207p_at_gmail.com; gbrait_at_hotmail.com;
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: Cisco ACE replacement****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Joe
>
> Waiting for your email, thank you very much. I want to see some logs and
> capture files :) ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Joseph L. Brunner <
> joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote:****
>
> Khan -
>
> You have full bsd under the hood for log analysis and netscaler logs are
> capture-able
>
> I'm sending you some commands our group uses - while their is support on
> the box - I was the netscaler guy for a fortune 100 from 2005 to 2008 -
> I'll be happy to help you
>
> Wait for email - pst's coming down to my toughbook with info I'll fwd
>
> Joe****
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com [mailto:khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 02:17 AM
> To: Haroon <itguy.pro_at_gmail.com>; Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Joseph L. Brunner; gaston brait <gbrait_at_hotmail.com>; Cisco
> certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Cisco ACE replacement
>
> I just bought two netscaler 8200 for a client, easy to set up but does not
> offer much in terms of troubleshooting as I can see from first view.
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haroon <itguy.pro_at_gmail.com>
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:03:41
> To: Joe Sanchez<marco207p_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Haroon <itguy.pro_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Joseph L. Brunner<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>; gaston brait<
> gbrait_at_hotmail.com>; Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Cisco ACE replacement
>
> thanks guys
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Agree with Joe on this one. ACE4710 hasn't changed much since 2008 and
> F5
> > has its own issues. Citrix is the way to go.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe Sanchez
> >
> > ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile
> > device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)
> >
> > On Jul 18, 2013, at 2:11 PM, "Joseph L. Brunner" <
> joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Agreed on Citrix Netscaler - don't let "Citrix" scare you - their box
> > KILLS the F5 and all that junk - much easier to setup and much better
> > results...
> > >
> > > NO PRODUCT ALIVE has ever made the same improvements in my customers
> > environments as Citrix Netscaler - we protect from DOS attacks, SYN
> FLOODS,
> > slow web pages loads - all with a single box...
> > >
> > > ACE, F5, all that - garbage when compared with the MPX series
> > netscaler... the VPX virtual ones we use also, but go with the larger
> MPX's
> > for a real powerhouse...
> > >
> > > -Joe
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > gaston brait
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:26 AM
> > > To: Haroon; Cisco certification
> > > Subject: RE: Cisco ACE replacement
> > >
> > > Citrix Netscaler
> > >
> > >> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:21:08 -0400
> > >> Subject: Cisco ACE replacement
> > >> From: itguy.pro_at_gmail.com
> > >> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>
> > >> Hey guys, need an answer on this please
> > >>
> > >> which cisco product replaced
> > >>
> > >> ACE 4710 - Version A3(2.4)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Is it worth it to upgrade the firmware to latest or go for the new
> > device?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> thanks,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Haroon
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >> ______________________________________________________________________
> > >> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Virtualization.net*
> *Post Jobs, News, Forums, Tutorials*
> http://www.virtualization.net
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jul 22 2013 - 09:56:20 ART