Thanks Nadeem, I guess you're right, this method will work fine. But, I was
wondering if there was any Cisco best practice when it comes to this sort
of implementations.
Rgds,
Jit
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Nadeem Anjum <nadeemkool_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> This is already a batter way. Do you require any specific feature btw this
> connectivity.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nadeem Anjum
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jitendra Anbu <jitanbu_at_gmail.com>
> *To:* Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 19, 2013 9:54 AM
> *Subject:* Real world scenario
>
> Hi experts, I have a real world question & hoping someone can provide some
> advice/guidance. The diagram bellow represents network connection(s) with a
> service providers Layer 2 switched network. These connections are Ethernet
>
> and all customer devices have layer 3 reachability between the Hub router
> and the Branch routers. Here are my questions and concerns;
>
> What is the best way to run a "secure" BGP connection(s) between the HUB
> and the branches B1 and B2? Assuming each branch and Hub will be in its own
> private AS. Also, the ISP does not take part in any routing. This might
> sound simple, just running p2p BGP sessions between the Hub and the
> branches and using IPSec to secure the data plane. But is there a better
> way to do this?
>
> HUB
>
> |
>
> ___|___
>
> |__ISP__|
>
> | |
>
> | |
>
> B1 B2
>
> Thanks,
> J
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 19 2013 - 16:40:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 01 2013 - 08:45:50 ART