Re: OT - eBGP ISP route manipulation

Can you put the LAN subnet into a vrf perhaps

--
BR
Sent from my iPhone on 3
On 24 Jun 2013, at 20:55, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> ISP will not change anything on their PE routers.  I cannot use NAT, as this
will break the application.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Does the ISP support orf? Or try NAT
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 24 Jun 2013, at 19:58, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Here is a good one.  Let's say you have a connection to an ISP and they
are
> > sending you a 1.0.0.0/8 but you only want to able to reach 1.5.1.35 and
> > 1.5.0.163 and you want BGP to run for the dynamic routing, but do not
want
> > to see the 1.0.0.0/8 becuase you are routing that network somewhere else.
> > You are not limited to anything other than the ISP will not change
anything
> > and you must keep it as simple as possible.
> >
> > I've labbed this up with these things in mind.
> >
> > CPE (customer side)
> >
> > unsuppress-map (doesn't work)
> > inject-map (didn't work)
> > ip-sla (didn't try yet, with static routes et...)
> > enhanced object tracking with IP-SLA using  boolean and(or) ( haven't
tried
> > this yet).
> >
> > Let me know what you guys/gals think...
> >
> > Joe Sanchez
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net