Depends on the wording of the task. Assuming you can use either, I find a
distribute-list to me more-appropriate if you want to prevent advertisement
completely. If you're told to not permit the next-hop router to
re-advertise the prefix to its own peers, you'll need to set an offset-list
accordingly.
Keller Giacomarro
keller.g_at_gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Rakesh M <raaki.88_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In a RIPV2 filtering task, a certain prefix was not supposed to be
> advertised to a peer. I used Distribute list while the solution used by the
> vendor was offset-list with metric out as 14. Though both of them would
> still work, is there any technical advantage of having one over the other,
> if asked in lab about filtering which method should be used.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Any Fool can Know The Point is to Understand - Einstein
>
> www.cciematrix.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 18 2013 - 22:56:14 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 01 2013 - 06:47:40 ART