Re: Cisco 3750G Scalability

From: Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:45:20 +0100

Should be fine, I was looking at this for the 3750-X's and it said 30 max, so not trusting it I went through ospf 1-31 with 31 being denied because of too many processes....

There's 512mb of RAM on the X's so I would check on the G's

What is your topology if you don't mind me asking as it is possible if your using routers to just use a vlan to bridge the vrf

--
BR
Tony
Sent from my iPad
On 9 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Gilles Fabre <fabre.gilles_at_voila.fr> wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> We have a 3750G stack running L3 protocols & VRF-lite/OSPF
> At the moment, we have 3 local VRF running, with a separate OPSF process for
> each of them (stub mode), working well.
> 
> We have a need to implement about 10 VRF more.
> I would like to know if some of you already deployed this kind of setup & if
> you observed some limitations on the actual number of vrf/ospf processes to
> run on this platform.
> 
> According to the Cisco documentation, 3750 can host up to 26 VRF (IOS
> limitation), but I would be interested if some of you already deployed this
> kind of setup & what the results were.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Gilles.
> ___________________________________________________________
> Qu'y a-t-il ce soir C  la tC)lC) ? D'un coup d'Eil, visualisez le programme
> sur Voila.fr http://tv.voila.fr/programmes/chaines-tnt/ce-soir.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 09 2013 - 21:45:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 01 2013 - 06:47:40 ART