Re: Network Design

From: Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 03:54:24 +0100

is their a WAN that the 3945 connects to? does it run BGP?

a good design IMO is something that has dual links & meshed to account
for single link/device failure scenarios, but is engineered enough to
ensure no asymmetric routing /. routing blackholes and routing loops,
run FHRP consider that your inbound/outbound routing or east to west
is tested prior to production

if you have the 3750-x then get two this makes them stackable and one
less problem should the single device fail

BR

Tony

On 31 March 2013 03:44, Cisco Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> My company hired a contractor who is a CCIE and I have learned some good
> things from him. But, still one question which I am not able to understand and
> can't get an answer for - What is considered a good network design? The answer
> I always get is "it depends". Understand that, so let me simplify in layman
> terms so that I can grasp the concept ...
> What is recommended if say you have a router (say 3945), a switch (say 6509)
> and access switches (3750x). How does this fit in "The Cisco Three-Layered
> Hierarchical Model".
> Should I consider 3945 as Core and 6509 as Distribution and configure
> InterVLAN routing on the 6509, OR, it's the other way around?
> -yuri
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Mar 31 2013 - 03:54:24 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 03 2013 - 19:06:19 ART