RE: Sham-Link and Redistribution.

Thanks Tom :D

----------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:19:59 -0600
> Subject: Re: Sham-Link and Redistribution.
> From: tom.kac_at_gmail.com
> To: kalpeshchheda_at_live.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Kalpesh,
> You should also check out the post that Yuri started a while ago concerning
> the same question. Really good discussion.
>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/201110/msg00232.html
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Kalpesh Chheda <kalpeshchheda_at_live.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi Experts,
> >
> > After configuring sham Link .Do two way redistribution(OSPF<->MP-BGP) is
> > required?
> > Because I am able to reach other end while doing only one way
> > redistribution (OSPF to MP-BGP).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kalpesh
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Mar 09 2013 - 07:54:55 ART