RE: MPLS VPN Related Query

Completely got that. p

Thanks Yuri.
_______________________________
> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 23:01:50 -0800
> Subject: Re: MPLS VPN Related Query
> From: yuribank_at_gmail.com
> To: kalpeshchheda_at_live.com
>
> Sorry, meant that I meant 'R2 by its virtue of its RR config'
>
> -Yuri
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Yuri Bank
> <yuribank_at_gmail.com<mailto:yuribank_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> VPNv4 prefixes that do not match import filters for any configured VRF
> will get filtered by default. In certain situations, such as on
> route-reflectors, this will cause issues.
>
> You can disable the behavior with:
>
> 'no bgp default route-target filter'
>
> Try configuring that on R3 (I'm assuming it is disabled by on R1 by
> virtue of its RR configuration).
>
> -Yuri
>
> -
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Kalpesh Chheda
> <kalpeshchheda_at_live.com<mailto:kalpeshchheda_at_live.com>> wrote:
> I have 3 routers connected serially. All three routers are PE.
>
> R1 ---- R2 ---- R3
>
> R1 is exporting some routes and R3 is importing that routes. R2 and R3
> are able to see vpnv4 routes in there vpnv4 table.
>
> But if R3 stops importing routes from R1 in to is VRF table. Routes are
> not even seen in its VPNv4 table. why?
>
> Because R2 have that VPNv4 routes by R1 in its table whether it is
> importing or not. p 5
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Mar 07 2013 - 12:39:50 ART