Re: EIGRP offered as an RFC

Suppose it's their science and they want to see what other vendors bring to
the table, agree stub flags would need to be set but Cisco says "it will work
with other vendors" so im sure it will be a a case of code implementation if a
vendor implements this, also reading that it mentions that eigrp is the best
solution for dmvpn scalability, I'm not that long in the tooth to agree or
disagree here what else can be used for dmvpn solutions?

Think in the end Cisco can only benefit and good luck

--
BR
Tony
Sent from my iPad
On 16 Feb 2013, at 00:15, Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I was quite shocked when I first heard this as well!! I'm not entirely sure
why the EIGRP stub feature is being left out though? Can someone please
enlighten me?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6599/ps66
30/qa_C67-726299.html
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Di Bias- CCIE #32840
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Surprised to hear of this but guess it is better for Cisco in the end with a
long term SDN approach with Cisco One!?
>
> Notice they won't offer NSSA, thoughts...
>
> I heard a lecture from Brian Dennis mentioned he used it in certain SP
environments so still a use case it seems
>
>
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net