Re: Is LDPv6 dead?

I've wondered about this too.I think it would be a good step to the IPv6
migration process.

My thoughts are that with an MPLS core, it doesn't really matter if you're
using IPv4 based IGP & signalling protocols, it's not like ISPs are running
out of /30s and Loopback addresses. With 6PE and 6VPE, there isn't much
incentive. What would be the real benefits to the business?

-Yuri

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I thought someone might have more insight. I was looking at IPv6 MPLS
> implementations and looks like all of them require IPv4 MPLS core. The
> reason for that is that currently there is no IPv6 signaling protocol.
> Looks like *draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07 *that proposed LDPv6 is expired.
> Does anyone know what is the latest in that field. Will we be stuck with
> dual-stack forever?
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Kacprzynski
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Feb 15 2013 - 11:41:20 ART