I'd say it's more than that, I sympathize with Joe's concern.
 From the weekly routing table report:
Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global)
-------------------------------------------------------
  /1:0        /2:0        /3:0        /4:0        /5:0        /6:0
  /7:0        /8:17       /9:13      /10:29      /11:88      /12:246
/13:482     /14:865     /15:1551    /16:12571   /17:6599    /18:10990
/19:21739   /20:31215   /21:33260   /22:45385   /23:41009   /24:232313
/25:1374    /26:1745    /27:861     /28:181     /29:74      /30:16
/31:0       /32:21
-Carlos
Dale Shaw @ 12/02/2013 08:15 -0300 dixit:
> G'day Joe,
>
> On Feb 12, 2013 8:59 PM, "Joseph L. Brunner" <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, perhaps I have been out of it lately - but seriously - since when did
>> ISP's start accepting /25, /26 and /27 into the table? Is this what the
> world
>> has come to???
>>
>> route-views>show ip bgp | inc /25
>
> Wow, that's terrible!
>
> Almost as bad as running "sh ip bgp" three times, one for each prefix
> length :-P
>
> Won't somebody please think of the electrons?
>
> cheers
> Dale
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Feb 12 2013 - 10:55:30 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 01 2013 - 07:57:58 ART