Hi Steve,
The configs are identical both sides.
I am suspecting
unidirectional link issue. when i do show lacp counters port-channel <ID> it
shows LACP PDU being sent but not received at both ends
I am planning to
enable UDLD and see. But I am wondering can we enable UDLD on a single
port-channel member or it has be enabled on the entire port-channel interface?
can you please assist?
Ramesh
________________________________
From: Steve
Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com>
To: ramesh Kumar <rameshkumar123321_at_yahoo.com>
Cc: "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday,
February 2, 2013 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: STP question// LACP
No TCN since STP
is running at the PortChannel level. It will however send
a trap and will how
up in your local log buffer:
If a segment within an EtherChannel fails,
traffic previously carried over
the failed link switches to the remaining
segments within the EtherChannel.
When a failure occurs, the EtherChannel
feature sends a trap that
identifies the switch, the EtherChannel, and the
failed link.
Regarding LACP an suspended link. Could you please provide
interface
configs from all ports on both sides? Are they all identical?
On
Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:08 AM, ramesh Kumar <rameshkumar123321_at_yahoo.com>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a port-channel of 8 links. one of them went to suspended
state.
> i took that link out of PO and the came back up as normal but adding
it
> back
> to the PO it goes to the suspend state. the config at both end are
the
> same.
> they are doing LACP and mode is set to be active at both ends.
What else we
> can try here? any clue?
>
> Also i would like to know if any
STP tcn is generated
> when a port-channel link moves to suspend state or not.
>
> please advice.
> Ramesh
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at
http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 04 2013 - 19:11:00 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 01 2013 - 07:57:58 ART