Re: bgp troubleshooting fast track

I would say to leave everything in place unless it effects your solution. For
example, if BGP max-hop is there, but not affecting your solution, leave it
and move on. There may be a subsequent task that requires you to remove it,
you won't know what/where it was breaking something further down the line.
 
Just my $.0005 (Steve has more money than I do, being that he's in Vegas). ;)
Regards,
Jay McMickle- 3x CCNP (R&S,Security,Design), CCIE #35355 (R&S)
 
From: Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com>
To: Radioactive Frog
<pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent:
Saturday, February 2, 2013 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: bgp troubleshooting fast track
When I took the CCIE lab we were told by the proctor to remove any and all
configurations that weren't asked of us. I'm not sure it wouldn't affect
grading but I wouldn't leave it there. If you use these commands in the lab
remove them before you leave!! Just my .002

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:10 AM,
Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Just wondering:
>
>
-==== on each RR ===
> router bgp 10
> bgp scan-time 5
> bgp delay 5
>
>
Obviously as we all know the above commands fast-tracks the bgp
>
troubleshooting to establishment ipv* neighbor-ship and vpnv* prefix
>
appearing on RR.
>
> Is it safe to say we can leave these 'additional'
parameter in actual lab
> exam?
> Obviously, in production environment we
wont' :)
>
> General lab rule is if it's not asked don't do it! - what are
your
> thoughts?
>
> Thanks
> -frog
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at
http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Sat Feb 02 2013 - 06:19:11 ART