Re: OSPF inter area routing between same area number

It's a bit weird in that context, but a fun exercise :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Sarad <tosara_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Brian, Carlos, Marko - I really enjoyed reading your article
> specially the Virtual link set up which I could not think of,
>
> Cheers
> Sara
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, you can do that with no problems. Few years back I wrote a blog
>> that describes this.
>>
>> You can find it here:
>> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/11/03/ospf-split-areas/
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Sarad <tosara_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Guys,
>> >
>> > I did a little ospf lab would like to verify what I noticed with you
>> > guys
>> > in case if I am missing anything.
>> >
>> > Assume I have following topology where area 10 is separated by area 0,
>> > In
>> > this scenario in area 10 even though area numbers are the same  they
>> > would
>> > typically work as separate areas. so OSPF routing and ospf database
>> > would
>> > look like same as in a typical topology with 3 areas. I assume reason
>> > for
>> > this when generating the Summary route by the ABR it does not include
>> > what's the source area number (like domain ID in MPLS)
>> >
>> >
>> > R1-------(Area 10)-----R2-----(Area 0)------R3-------(Area 10)--------R4
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Sara
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net