Re: OSPF LSA type 3 filtering

Unbelievable,

You are saying that LSA Type-2s don't provide reachability information, I
am saying and showing you that they do provide the subnet mask, you then
say that you should NOT say LSA filtering because we can not theoretically
filter LSAs, especially when you are going to take the CCIE lab, let me
tell you something, they will probably say "LSA Type 3 Filtering" as the
header, they mention that in every Doc CD i have read, now whose student/s
will miss out on the terminology? You guys use it because it is "commonly
used" (Based on Petr) or Cisco says it that way in their DOC-CD, but if I
say it, you claim that I do not understand basics of OSPF or routing and I
should be teaching CCNA.

Then, you agree with Paul about my explanation, and then you ask him what
does that have to do with "Area range" or the other commands, so why is it
OK with you to use the term "LSA Filtering" and Not anyone else? Check how
quick you agreed with Paul, and he was basically repeating what I
mentioned, that tells me that you are agreeing with me but you like to
argue. I even said at the end of my post "I am not disagreeing with you",
but I guess it did not click.

Once again, stop doing that. Do you know how to unsubscribe a person from a
thread? You are very good with google, try it one more time.

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan_at_ine.com> wrote:

> You need to relax Narbik. I'm not sure how you made this leap in the
> discussion, but thanks for once again ruining a potentially helpful and
> intellectual thread on the list. My apologies if I somehow offended you.
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2013, at 2:34 AM, "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are VERY WRONG. Picking words and acting as though you are an attorney
> did not convince me a bit, but your immaturity is what you definitely
> proved here today. You are in a routing loop my friend, we made a full
> circle.
>
> Unsubscribe me from further responses. Paul B the owner of this forum
> forgot to put a disclaimer about people under legal age.
>
> If this continues, I will ignore your replies or comments all together, or
> i will be very rude.
>
> How do you connect this discussion about my students failing because in
> many words they attended my class? What does that have to do with this
> discussion? A student of mine told me that you guys in your volumes say
> "filtering LSA Type 3", so what gives you the right to use the terms that
> you disagree with?
>
> I even commented in your blog, when Petr wrote an article "ospf route
> filtering demystified" right after I released a 10 minute VoD on OSPF
> Filtering, and he admitted in the blog that he uses that same term because
> Cisco uses it in their documentation, but if I use it, I don't know what I
> am talking about? Here incase you forgot:
> http://blog.ine.com/2009/08/17/ospf-route-filtering-demystified/
>
> As I said before unsubscribe me from this thread.
>
>
>

-- 
*Narbik Kocharians
*CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
*www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
A Cisco Learning Partner
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net