Re: cam timer tuning

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:48:31 -0800

TC and event correlation are not cause and effect. The issue is that a
host went down and someone was still transmitting to it. And can do so
for 4 more hours :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
> That won't cut this, because the event happens *when there is a TC*.
> No way you will get ARP down to 15 seconds or so.
> Nah, identify your silent destinations and ping them from the DG :)
>
> -Carlos
>
> Marko Milivojevic @ 28/12/2012 15:38 -0300 dixit:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Joseph L. Brunner
>> <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You should unify all timers at 600 seconds.
>>>
>>> That number is usually good to me.
>>
>>
>> It's hard to change ARp timers in the entire domain. I was thinking
>> more along the lines of dramatically increasing the aging timers in
>> CAM tables to match the ARP :-)
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Dec 28 2012 - 14:48:31 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 01 2013 - 09:36:53 ART