Quite right. I don't think this is the result of STP. I believe this
is the result of "silent" hosts, or hosts that disappear from the
network, while someone is still sending them traffic (and knows about
their existence).
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Joseph L. Brunner <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote: > No b stp is a totally different feature. The root bridge in each vlan keeps > the network in a converged state b and that includes bpdubs that keep > flowing ever 2 seconds to keep blocking links blocking, etc. > > > > The goal of unifying the timers is make sure no unknown unicasts flood your > network when the router has superior information it saved with its longer > default timers than the cam table. > > > > Is this even an issue? > > > > This is usually 1% or less of unknown unicast activity. > > > > If you have lots of unknown unicasts from stale arp timers b I would suspect > you have other issues b like a port scan or virus looking for machines that > are not up friend. > > > > From: Naufal Jamal [mailto:naufalccie_at_yahoo.in] > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 1:13 PM > To: Joseph L. Brunner; Marko Milivojevic > > > Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com > Subject: Re: cam timer tuning > > > > If we change the arp/cam timers to 600 secs across the entire L2 domain ie. > including csw's and asw's is there any STP reconvergence that could happen? > would we see any STP outage? I dont think there should be. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Joseph L. Brunner <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> > To: Naufal Jamal <naufalccie_at_yahoo.in>; Marko Milivojevic > <markom_at_ipexpert.com> > Cc: "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > Sent: Friday, 28 December 2012 11:35 PM > Subject: RE: cam timer tuning > > > You should unify all timers at 600 seconds. > > That number is usually good to me. > > thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > Naufal Jamal > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 12:43 PM > To: Marko Milivojevic > Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com > Subject: Re: cam timer tuning > > Hi Marko, > > Nexus ----------------trunk----------4948 > Arp timer:1500 secs > Arp timer: 4 hours > Cam timer:1800 secs Cam > timer: 300 secs > > I know cam timer should be greater than arp timer to avoid flood. Should we > try to make the cam timer in 4948 more than 1500 secs or make the arp timer > in nexus less than 300 (aging arp in 300 secs ?? ) Any inputs? > ________________________________ > From: Marko Milivojevic > <markom_at_ipexpert.com> > To: Naufal Jamal <naufalccie_at_yahoo.in> > Cc: > "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > Sent: Friday, 28 December > 2012 10:29 PM > Subject: Re: cam timer tuning > > When I've seen this in the past, > it was usually discrepancy between > host ARP and switch MAC aging timers. Try lowering timers on your switches > to be under/same as the ARP timers on hosts and see if there are any > differences. > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP > R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:40 AM, > Naufal Jamal <naufalccie_at_yahoo.in> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We have a pair of nexus > 7K's (without vpc) running HSRP and MSTP. >> They are connected to access layer > switches 4948's. whenever we bring up a new >> trunk link between Nexus 7K and > 4948 we see unicast flooding caused due to >> TCN's. I am wondering if it has > something to do with the difference in cam >> aging timer in both the > platforms. Nexus (1800 secs) and 4948 (300 secs). can >> anyone put some light > here please? I am thinking that changing the aging timer >> on nexus to 300 > secs should help.. any thoughts? >> >> Naufal >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at > http://www.ccie.net >> >> > _______________________________________________________________________ >> > Subscription information may be found at: >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri Dec 28 2012 - 10:39:08 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 01 2013 - 09:36:53 ART